The IMO sulfur regulations that take effect in January 2020 are starting to redefine the choice of bunkering ports and impact the cargo-carrying capacity of dry bulk ships, according to freight market participants.
A large number of dry bulk carriers trading in the Asia-Pacific have already made the switch to 0.5% sulfur marine fuel to comply with the new IMO requirement. The move is starting to result in many changes, such as dry bulk shipowners and operators preferring straight run 0.5% sulfur fuel, also known as low sulfur fuel oil (LSFO) over blended fuel grades to ensure the safety of their ships and for operational ease.
“If we go to a place where we know we can get straight run LSFO, we try to maximise and take as much of it as possible,” said a ship operating source, adding this could reduce the amount of cargo that would be loaded on the ship by 500 – 1000 mt to enable the higher intake of bunker fuel.
Bunkering delays
Dry bulk shipowners are now planning the purchase of bunkers well in advance for procuring 0.5% sulfur grade; unlike in the past, when 3.5% sulfur bunker fuel was bought promptly.
“Not only do we need to plan in advance for stemming [supplying] bunkers, but there is also time involved in waiting to complete the bunkering,” a shipowner said. “We are having to book bunkers about 2 – 3 weeks in advance to ensure availability and bunker suppliers would give a small, 2 – 3 day laycan,” the shipowner added. Most of the time, it is unlikely that a vessel would call at the bunkering port within the laycan.
Quality concerns
Debate is continuing over the use of straight run LSFO vs blended grades as the market settles into the new IMO sulfur regulation regime.
“There is a bit of panic about the quality of blended LSFO that is available at the major bunkering ports,” a second ship operating source said. “There does seem to be a lot of blended fuel oil around which we as operators would not be comfortable using as we are unsure if there are going to be quality claims and how that is going to be handled.”
The viscosity of the LSFO supplied is also causing concerns for shipowners. Many stems supplied have had issues with low viscosity. The preference is for LSFO with a viscosity of at least 100 CST. Higher viscosity usually reflects a better calorific value and is apt for current ship engines. Lower viscosity can cause incomplete combustion and can affect the performance of the ship’s engine.
More bunker, less cargo
Another issue vexing shipowners and operators is the availability of compliant fuel in ports with lower bunker sales volumes. The uncertainty over the availability of LSFO at these ports, along with the lack of clean barges, is resulting in longer waiting times for taking bunkers. To mitigate this issue, shipowners are trying to carry as much LSFO on board as is possible given the design of the ship.
On the Indonesia-India coal route, a shipowner would typically take bunkers in Singapore, which would be just enough to ballast to South Africa after completing the cargo discharge in either east or west coast India. But currently, shipowners and operators are trying to bunker their ships to the maximum possible volume when it passes through ports that have LSFO, and load less cargo to accommodate the extra bunker fuel on board.
Read the article online at: https://www.drybulkmagazine.com/shipping/12122019/imo-2020-fuel-switch-prompts-bulkers-to-load-less-cargo/
