“We know the sea is rising. … This is not something that’s out there in the future, it’s happening now,” said Assemblywoman Tasha Boerner Horvath, D-Encinitas, who had requested to revive and chair this committee. “How do we preserve what’s wonderful about our coastline, but really face the realities of the next 100 years with sea level rise?
The committee reconvenes at a time when the call for bolder actions on climate change is resonating across the country and the world. Youth activists have staged sit-ins and hunger strikes, scientists are speaking out and even Jane Fonda has joined the fray.
Former Secretary of State John F. Kerry, along with former California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and a new bipartisan coalition of Hollywood celebrities, this weekend declared “World War Zero – the war for net zero carbon emissions.” World leaders this week are gathering at the United Nations Climate Change conference in Madrid for yet another bargaining session over how to stop the planet from overheating.
And more Californians – overwhelmed by swings of drought, then fires, then atmospheric river storms – are waking up to the looming disaster on the shore. More than $150 billion in property could be at risk of flooding by 2100 – the economic damage far more devastating than the state’s worst earthquakes and wildfires. Salt marshes, home to shorebirds and endangered species, face extinction.
In Southern California alone, two-thirds of beaches could vanish and coastal cliffs could erode 130 feet farther inland, according to recent studies by the U.S. Geological Survey. Along the shores of Del Mar, train tracks run precariously close to the edge of collapsing cliffs. Lawmakers on Tuesday watched in sober silence as a scientist from the Scripps Institution of Oceanography played videos of a cliff crumbling in Del Mar and a train rumbling by minutes later.
Heavy rains over Thanksgiving had triggered more landslides along this crucial rail corridor on the coast – the only route that connects Los Angeles to San Diego for Amtrak, Coaster and freight trains.
How much worse this all gets depends on how much Californians and the rest of the world can curb carbon emissions. The ocean, after all, is absorbing most of this heat.
“First and foremost, when we think about how to deal with sea level rise – we must think about how to deal with emissions, and how to keep that curve as low as possible moving forward,” said Mark Merrifield, director of Scripps’ Center for Climate Change Impacts and Adaptation. “We face a few different scenarios in the future, depending on how bad it actually gets.”
Boerner Horvath lives along the coast, sees the precarious train tracks fighting for time, and hears how cities in her district are paralyzed by costs and planning decisions beyond what any small town has ever had to confront. Taking charge of this revived Assembly committee, she wants to get the state Legislature caught up on what the data shows and where along the coast needs immediate attention.
“We’re already late to this discussion,” said Boerner Horvath, who held Tuesday’s meeting at Encinitas City Hall. “We’ve studied a lot, and there’s always more to study, but we have pressing issues now throughout our state that we need to address.”
The select committee was formed in 2013 by then-Assemblyman Richard Gordon. Members met for a year and studied the effects of sea level rise on agriculture, tourism, fishing and critical infrastructure. A report summarizing the committee’s findings noted that the top two barriers for taking action on this looming crisis in California are a lack of funding and lack of staff.
“Take action now to address sea level rise, it is not too late,” the report, now 5 years old, urged. “Sea level rise is not a surprise. We know it is happening and will only worsen. We must take advantage of the time we have to address this impending emergency now.”
The severity of impacts will be linked to how quickly action is taken, the report added, citing a statistic from the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy on the East Coast: “If $15 billion of infrastructure improvements had been done prior to the storm, it would have mitigated most of the $60 billion costs that accrued to taxpayers after the storm.”
