• Latest
  • Trending
  • All
Procurement Perspectives: How best to monitor contractor performance fairly?

Procurement Perspectives: How best to monitor contractor performance fairly?

November 12, 2019
Last Mile Delivery Market Worth Observing Growth | UPS, FedEx, SF Express

Last Mile Delivery Market Worth Observing Growth | UPS, FedEx, SF Express

April 23, 2024
Top 5 Spend Analysis Software ranked in 2024

Top 5 Spend Analysis Software ranked in 2024

March 1, 2024
How Tesla And BMW Are Leading A Supply Chain Renaissance With Blockchain

How Tesla And BMW Are Leading A Supply Chain Renaissance With Blockchain

January 19, 2024
LATAM Cargo strengthens European cargo links

LATAM Cargo strengthens European cargo links

April 14, 2020
Ford making reusable hospital gowns from airbag materials as efforts against coronavirus expand

Ford making reusable hospital gowns from airbag materials as efforts against coronavirus expand

April 14, 2020
Don’t Sweat NBC’s Decision to Cut Back on Television Ad Inventory

Don’t Sweat NBC’s Decision to Cut Back on Television Ad Inventory

April 14, 2020
Software firms sharpen focus on AI, big data as IT spending drops

Software firms sharpen focus on AI, big data as IT spending drops

April 14, 2020
Navigating turbulent times in your supply chain (TL:DR version)

Navigating turbulent times in your supply chain (TL:DR version)

April 14, 2020
Last Mile Delivery by Drones Market is Booming Worldwide

Last Mile Delivery by Drones Market is Booming Worldwide

April 14, 2020
AIR CARGO MARKET SIZE, SHARE, DEMAND, TREND, LATEST INNOVATIONS & APPLICATION ANALYSIS AND INDUSTRY GROWTH FORECAST 2027 – Science In Me

AIR CARGO MARKET SIZE, SHARE, DEMAND, TREND, LATEST INNOVATIONS & APPLICATION ANALYSIS AND INDUSTRY GROWTH FORECAST 2027 – Science In Me

April 14, 2020
Wheat procurement in Patiala: 6,500 coupons issued to farmers – cities

Wheat procurement in Patiala: 6,500 coupons issued to farmers – cities

April 14, 2020
Pandemic, Plastics And The Continuing Quest For Sustainability

Pandemic, Plastics And The Continuing Quest For Sustainability

April 14, 2020
  • Supply Chain
  • Logistics
  • Warehousing
  • Procurement
  • Shipping
  • More
    • Strategic Sourcing
    • Spend Analysis
    • Inventory
    • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
United States International Supply Chain Commission
United States International Supply Chain Commission
Home Procurement

Procurement Perspectives: How best to monitor contractor performance fairly?

by usiscc
November 12, 2019
in Procurement
0
Procurement Perspectives: How best to monitor contractor performance fairly?
492
SHARES
1.4k
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

I would most likely be one of the biggest proponents of measuring vendor and contractor performance. Having said that, it must be done in a manner that is fair to the owner as well as the suppliers, without any bias by the evaluation person or team.

Too many times in my purchasing career, I have seen unfair assessments done on contractors and vendors because the evaluator had an axe to grind with the specific company being assessed using a performance review.

Monitoring of supplier/contractor performance is the latest rage, both in the public and private sectors. Done properly, it is a great tool to assess how to work with certain suppliers moving forward. Done poorly, it can destroy the reputation of good contractors, and unfairly promote the work of subpar suppliers. It is quite possible that poor performers have a friend inside the organization that are willing to promote poor performing vendors for additional work, and yes that does happen on occasion.

Sadly, most suppliers are not privy to how they are assessed via performance reviews, and only find out after they are cut off from working for that owner and start looking for reasons why they are no longer bidding on projects. To prevent any skullduggery in this process, I would offer a few suggestions to level the playing field for everyone.

As I have stated in past columns, measurement of course, is only the first step. The results obtained must then be properly factored into the procurement decisions. Here again, however, I can see certain risks in excessive reliance on a competitive bidding process that focuses entirely on sticker price.

One-off purchase orders, short-term contracts, and a consistent emphasis on competitive bidding tend to foster an adversarial relationship between supplier and customer. Such a relationship may jeopardize the highest levels of supplier performance. Accordingly, a supplier performance monitoring program is most likely to be of value where there is an enduring (i.e., medium or long-term) supply relationship in place.

In my experience, profit maximizing suppliers will deliver above average performance when such performance influences the chance of contract renewal. In the case of a purchaser who places no or little value on past performance when deciding upon choice of supplier, there is no incentive to invest time or resources in providing top level customer support. In times of product shortage, the indifferent customer is serviced last.

It follows that in order to improve service levels, municipalities as well as private sector companies, must signal to their suppliers and contractors that the quality of service matters. This can only be done by making prior service quality a relevant factor in the award of any contract, public or private.

In broad terms, the process of supplier evaluation can be loosely compared to the annual appraisal process for employees. Again, if your boss is not a fan of your work, the likelihood of you receiving a good performance review that is unbiased is very remote. Much as such appraisal is best when carried out in a fair and systematic manner, with clear direction being given to the employee, the same can be said for ongoing supplier appraisals.

My personal viewpoint on vendor performance reviews is very simple. They should be conducted by a team of possibly three people that work with that supplier on a regular basis. That way if one person has a bias against the company, or a person working for that organization, the other two can bring a voice of reason to the review. This process involving three people stops, or at the very least cuts down on the unreliable single viewpoint of one bias evaluator.

I believe that performance reviews will become a common feature for the future, for vendors that work with specific owners on a regular basis.

 

Stephen Bauld is a government procurement expert and can be reached at [email protected].

Some of his columns may contain excerpts from The Municipal Procurement Handbook published by Butterworths.

Share197Tweet123
usiscc

usiscc

  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest
‘Significant opportunity’ in Asia as supply chain integrates, consolidates

‘Significant opportunity’ in Asia as supply chain integrates, consolidates

January 3, 2020
Last Mile Delivery Market Worth Observing Growth | UPS, FedEx, SF Express

Last Mile Delivery Market Worth Observing Growth | UPS, FedEx, SF Express

April 23, 2024
3 keys to mitigating severe supply shortages from coronavirus disruption

3 keys to mitigating severe supply shortages from coronavirus disruption

March 18, 2020
Art Battle Wichita Falls III at The Warehouse, 1401 Lamar.

Art Battle Wichita Falls III at The Warehouse, 1401 Lamar.

0
Global Industry Analysis, Size, Share, Growth, Trends, and Forecasts 2016–2024 – ZMR News Reports

Global Industry Analysis, Size, Share, Growth, Trends, and Forecasts 2016–2024 – ZMR News Reports

0
PHOTOS: Ottawa firefighters respond to warehouse fire

PHOTOS: Ottawa firefighters respond to warehouse fire

0
Last Mile Delivery Market Worth Observing Growth | UPS, FedEx, SF Express

Last Mile Delivery Market Worth Observing Growth | UPS, FedEx, SF Express

April 23, 2024
Top 5 Spend Analysis Software ranked in 2024

Top 5 Spend Analysis Software ranked in 2024

March 1, 2024
How Tesla And BMW Are Leading A Supply Chain Renaissance With Blockchain

How Tesla And BMW Are Leading A Supply Chain Renaissance With Blockchain

January 19, 2024
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Disclaimer
  • DMCA
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2024 United States International Supply Chain Commission (usiscc.org)

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Cookie settingsACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled

Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.

Non-necessary

Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.

SAVE & ACCEPT
No Result
View All Result
  • Supply Chain
  • Logistics
  • Warehousing
  • Procurement
  • Shipping
  • More
    • Strategic Sourcing
    • Spend Analysis
    • Inventory
    • Contact Us

Copyright © 2024 United States International Supply Chain Commission (usiscc.org)